Fragile Peace Under Strain in Juba
South Sudan’s 2018 Revitalised Agreement still anchors hopes of stability, but its pillars are wobbling. Delayed security reforms, contested timelines and growing economic hardship have seeded doubt among citizens and officials alike about the accord’s durability.
Civil Society Rings Alarm Bells
Edmund Yakani, Executive Director of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization, told reporters that “the deal was signed to stop bloodshed, not to polish reputations.” He believes selective engagement and parallel negotiations erode collective ownership and sharpen divisions among former foes.
Calls for Inclusive Mechanisms
Yakani argues that genuine dialogue means sitting as equals within the institutions outlined by the R-ARCSS, acknowledging grievances and crafting joint solutions. He cautions that bypassing these structures for unilateral decisions weakens trust and risks reversing hard-won security gains.
Regional and International Stakes
The activist urges IGAD guarantors, African Union envoys and donor partners to “remind leaders of their commitments” while respecting South Sudan’s sovereignty. Observers note that sustained engagement from neighbours is vital to prevent local disputes from spiralling into broader instability.
Path Forward for Signatories
Public frustration over slow progress is palpable. Yakani warns that failure to revive honest dialogue could return the nation to conflict, with suffering as the only winner. He calls on political elites to prioritise responsibility and compromise, clearing the road to credible elections.